June '09
145. Completing the Foredeck
146. Gunwale Rubbers
147. Hatch Hinges
148. Foredeck Hardware
149. Drink Holders

145. Completing the Foredeck

It is a strange feeling to come to the end of the major part of the woodworking after three and a half years. There are still things like the gunwale rubber and drink holders, and the like, but the constructional part of this boat is finished. Two of my least favoured jobs remain to be done: the deck glue-down and the varnishing. There are still a few minor electrical tasks to be completed too, and the windscreens to fit, but right now I can stand on the back deck, looking over the cockpit and foredeck, and marvel at this thing which has emerged out of the chaos which surrounds it.



Anyway, on to the conclusion. The planking is complete except for the outer edges of the hatch covers, where there has to be a bit of wood removed to allow them to open. While I was cutting these parts a strange visitor appeared out of the fence in my table saw. It apparently lives there, and seemed quite at home covered in sawdust. If I knew what it was called I might even rename the boat after it. But I don't.



Over the hatch covers there is a small drop in height from the rest of the deck, about 1 mm., because the hatches are not quite thick enough to ride flush; but there is no need to correct this. The hatches will have metal trim around them, and the trim will level them to the deck. Having a potential drop will merely serve to ensure that the trim makes a firm closure.

The job of gluing down the decking starts at the king plank in front of the windscreen. Some assistance is available here in the form of the spotlight. It is mounted on a plinth, and, by tightening its handle under the dash, downward pressure is exerted which clamps down on the king plank. Downward pressure on the light's post is designed to point the light itself down, so that is resisted by a wedged block. The rest of the plank is fixed by clamps at hatch opening level, and by the ply washers along the sides, as are some neighbouring planks too.


The spotlight on its plinth.


The king plank and three neighbouring port side strips are glued down.

When the short planks behind the hatch are completed you come up against the boards which run full length from the windscreen to the covering board. It is necessary to have the covering boards glued on before attempting these longer planks, just to make sure that their forward alignment is correct. If they shift to leave too small a gap between themselves and the covering boards that it not too much of a problem, but if they make too large a gap it is. You might think that having all these washers and screws in would hold the planks in their correct position, but in fact there is quite a bit of play in them, and they have to be adjusted with 3 mm. shim sticks all the time during glue-down to ensure uniform gaps.


A 3 mm. shim stick checks the gaps between planks (left), and after the glue has dried (right).

The glue-down of the covering boards is a clamp hungry manoeuvre which takes a bit of improvisation too. The original plan for this boat did not require a lower rubbing strake to be fitted, but I have found it invaluable as a seat for the clamps. Without it I would have had to have used staples, with all the unsightly scars they would have left.


The port covering board is glued down.

While the covering board is setting I can get on with the starboard planking behind the hatch. Three short strips are glued down there. This completes the section between the windscreen and the hatch.




While waiting for this lot of epoxy to set I have been sanding back some of the port covering board to see what the glue lines will look like. The pre-sanded and post-sanded photos are not from the same board, but the effect is very similar. One is the starboard and the other is the port covering board. At least without finish on them they look pretty good. Whether that stands up to a varnish time will tell.



Before (left), and after (right) sanding the forward covering board joints.

Attaching the starboard covering board is basically the same as the port, except for the treatment of the bow. Here, there is a lot of resistance to the two halves meeting at a tight junction. I racked my brains trying to come up with some sort of wedged clamp system which could be used to hold the two halves together, but then it occurred to me that the sheer is going to be used to anchor the gunwale, so why not some clamps as well?

Three simple blocks are screwed through the hull side into the sheer where the hole will later be covered by the gunwale rubber, after filling, of course. These push up tightly against the tip of the starboard covering board and force it against the port, which is already glued down. Some downward pressure on the joint line further forces the two together, and a fairly tight glue line results. One of those traditional bow ornaments would also have been very useful, as it could have covered any screws which might have been called into service for this task.


The starboard covering board is glued down, and three simple clamps on the sheer force a tight joint.

There is still a lot of gluing to be done on this deck, but it is beginning to take shape, and can be seen in its almost ready state now, from the port.



Next come the king plank between the bow and the hatch, and the three planks on either side of it. I have been giving some thought to the termination of the decking planks at the hatch. As it stands they merely end abruptly, so that the caulking will have to end there too. It would be neater if there were some sort of dam wall to hold the caulking in, and up to which the decking planks could run. It needs only be a narrow strip of 5 mm. mahogany running athwart to the planks. To allow for it I have either to advance the king plank and the accompanying members forwards by the width of the strip, or take the router to the hatch end after they have been glued down. That will probably result in a neater cut, so on with the glue-down.


All the strips in front of the hatch are now glued down.

Once the third strip from the king plank is reached it is time to pause. The next one has to align precisely with the side of the hatch, so the gap between the third and fourth planks is critical. If it is too big, some of the inner edge of plank four can be shaved off where it is rebated for the hatch. If it is too small, some of its inner edge where it is not rebated will have to go. So I have to wait for the glue to dry before proceeding.


Here the hatch-side planks are lifted away from
the central, completed part of the deck.

As it happened the spacing was right, so the next planks went down without too much fuss. Working on the side decking here I can only go as far as the second last plank. The last one is not cut to fit the covering board (or, rather, it presently fits it tightly) so will have to be routed. But the router will not be able to reach its aft end, next to the windscreen. That end will have to be finished by hand in line with the routed edge further forward on the plank. Therefore, the plank has to be removable. The routing will be done with it stuck down on double sided tape. That means that the epoxy which has oozed out onto the subdeck where the last plank is to go will have to be dried first.


The port side of the foredeck is finished except for the last plank.

Epoxy ooze is a constant bother, and continues for hours after it is first laid. The drips and runs seen here are on the sides of the hatch opening, and have been wiped away three times already, only to reappear.


Runs on the hatch opening.

A full day of gluing and screwing is needed to do both sides, minus the outer planks. I eventually gave up using masking tapes as the epoxy gets everywhere anyway. It is best just to wipe it up with acetone or metho and sand the wood later, which was going to happen anyway. The dirtiest job is going back after the epoxy has partially gone off, and scraping out the excess from the caulking gaps, so that there will be enough room to squeeze in the Sikaflex. With all that coming out to the surface it is then a good idea to prevent the ply washers from sticking to the decking by inserting silicone paper strips between the two. It is quite tedious. The thought that I am nearly done with the epoxy for good delights me.



Both sides glued down, then washers removed.


Finally, the side strips are routed and glued on.



I would have to say that the router method of creating a groove between the covering boards and the decking planks was problematic. It went very smoothly on the rear deck, but on the foredeck the camber at the edge is greater, so that there is no flat surface for the router base to ride on. Also, at the sharpest part of the curve on the hull there is hardly any of the router fence in contact with the hull. The result is a somewhat wavy groove which will not look so good filled with caulking. The worst part of it occurs near the bow.


A wavy groove.

Because the decking planks at this level are presenting almost total end grain it is not easy to smooth out the groove with hand sanding either. The alternative method of creating this groove would have been to hand shape the planks to the covering board, and I think that that would have resulted in a number of irregularities as well, so I don't really know what to do differently next time. I have a sinking feeling, however, that this is going to look a lot worse when the caulking goes in.

Even if you manage to avoid these pitfalls, the router bit is running against the grain on the port side. It has, after all, to trim the decking planks, not the covering boards which are already shaped. So the bit has to run uphill against the grain on one side of the boat. With White Beech the effect is more like a cheese grater than a router, and there is quite a bit of feathered grain which need to be sanded off. The cut is cleaner on the mahogany, but unless the router bit is perfectly sharp there is a potential for it to run amok. It did so to the extent that it melted and snapped off in my case, and it wasn't all that blunt to begin with!

To ruin your good work after all this time, in an area which cannot be disguised, is deeply disappointing, to say the least. The neighbours may begin to complain about the language, as well as the noise. Never mind, if it looks really obvious I can cover it with some judiciously chosen piece of deck hardware. So, now there is only the hatch covers to complete before moving on the the gunwales.


Hatch covers drying.

They should have been simple, and, indeed, one of them was. On the starboard hatch, however, a depression had developed in the ply subdeck, which was quite noticeable, even with the decking planks attached. Perhaps it is where I sat more often than not when getting into the motor compartment. Whatever the cause, the outcome was a far from fair line on the decking. So, it had to be packed up somehow. I elected to do this with wooden shims between the subdeck and the deck, which created a space which I filled with epoxy thickened with West 410 Microlight, which is what I used to fair the hull all those aeons ago. It had to be applied thickly so as not to run out into the gaps, but even so, the difference between the good hatch and the bad one is obvious by the colour of the gaps. The bad one is full of pale Microlight, which has to be scraped out when it has thickened sufficiently.


The white looking Microlight seen in the caulking gaps on the starboard hatch (left), and clean lines on the port.

The method did result in a fair deck line, so the foredeck is now complete and ready for caulking.






Having had time to reflect on this method of decking, I can say that I think it is slow, messy and imprecise. The certainty of being to able to screw down a plank and then cap the screw hole has a lot to recommend it, but is not practical in 5 mm. thick boards. The Gougeon Bros. method of screw and washer fixation would be a lot better if one were not screwing into a ply subdeck of only 6 mm., and is clearly designed for heavier decking than mine. On the other hand, prefabricated plydeck looks just that, and has the added disadvantage of having only 1 mm. of the surface timber, usually teak and ash.

The Selway Fisher design, which recommends a second skin of ply, or narrow teak strips with epoxy caulking, is having a punt in both markets, so I guess that you trim your cloth to match your pocket, and your patience. I am hopeful that the finished appearance of this deck will justify the time taken, but in order not to ruin it altogether with the caulking I am going to apply a coat or two of sacrificial varnish before the caulking. This will then be sanded away, but will help to protect the Beech from black staining with the Sikaflex. Laying the deck is only just the beginning of the work!


Top of Page




146. Gunwale Rubbers

The Andrews designed Slipper Launches achieved gunwale protection by attaching chromed brass rubbing strips to the edges of the covering boards. This was possible because the covering boards were the real thing, not veneers on a ply subdeck. The plans for Ariadne call for a half round profile edging of hardwood, 36 mm. in diameter, which is screwed into the side of the hull and the sheer strakes. That would make it far too big to take a rubbing strip to cover it, and it is obviously meant to replace such a device.

I have a problem with the semicircular profile, it being so dumb looking on an otherwise elegant craft. But, considering that the subdeck and deck make up a thickness of 11 mm., if the screws are not to enter the sheer strakes right on their edges there has to be a reasonably wide timber, assuming that they are to go through the rubber's centre. 12 gauge screws are specified, so even at 36 mm. diameter there will only be a gap of about 4 mm. between the screw hole and the top of the sheer. The plan makes no mention of gluing the rubber on to the hull and deck side, and it may be an attractive proposition not to, so that any damaged parts could be replaced at a later date. But with this fairly tenuous grip on the boat I think it needs gluing.

I am using the same Merbau timber that I used for the rubbing strakes already completed, and that means three lengths of wood scarfed together again. With 18 mm. of thickness and 36 mm. of width they are going to offer a lot of resistance to bending, especially at the stern where they have to follow the line of the deck in a downwards curve.

This time, in order to try to avoid the unyielding sections where the scarf joints are, I will scarf the short segment into the middle of the rubber. (The timber is 2.7 metres long, so only 2-1/2 lengths are needed). That way, the sharp downward curve at the rear of the gunwale will occur in an unscarfed section, and will hopefully follow the deck line more accurately than the lower rubbing strake did.

Fitting starts at the bow where the angle between the stem and the hull has to transferred to the rubber. With the rest of its length supported by a ceiling line, the first screw is driven into the sheer.


A line from the garage door holds the rubber while the bow is connected.

From then on it is merely a matter of moving the rubber down to deck level at each screw, and push it tightly against the hull while they are driven in. The first few are easy, but after that the increasing curvature of the hull makes it more and more difficult. Some help is found from bracing, against anything which will offer resistance. There is no possibility of clamping here as there was with the lower running strake until you get to within reach of the hatch opening.
Then, however, the pull of the clamp tends to approximate the upper end of the rubber against the deck, but leave an opening at its lower edge. Again, braces can help close the gaps.


Extra help needed to clamp the rubber to the hull.

 

Finally, and even after some steaming, there was a snap and the rubber broke right at the point where the sheer strake did all those years ago. I am reluctant to start over because of the screw holes already in the sheer. You never get them quite right a second time. So, I will try to repair the break.

 
The gunwale rubber snaps at the sharpest part of the curve.


Back to the bloody epoxy again!


Clamping the repair.

While waiting for that to set I have given some thought to the look of the rubber. It is, as I feared, excessively unattractive because of its width. But I do not think a semicircular profile would help either. It is just too plod-like. I will chamfer the top and bottom edges of the strip, as I did for the lower strake, and leave the middle unshaped. But to give it a touch of pizzazz I am going to fill the screw holes with black plugs. Some Wenge should do the job nicely, and that will complement an ebony cap which I will put on top of the stem to cover its end grain.

The repair looks good. Now it will have to stand up to bending again. This time the whole area will be soaked in boiling water for half an hour before attempting the attachment. As long as the temperature is not high enough to soften the epoxy, which I believe it is not, there should be a good chance of getting it to take the curve.


This repair should be just as strong as a scarf joint.

To soak the piece I wrap a towel around it and pour boiling water over it repeatedly. Only one section of it needs to be steamed in this way, because the rest of it is a fairly straight run.



But, the result is the same again. The snap is straight through the original, splitting apart the epoxy join. So much for its superior strength.



The thought occurs to me that part of the problem here might be the weakening effect of the 1/2" bores necessary to take the 12 gauge screw heads. Cutting the leading end on another piece of wood, and fixing it with a single screw to the bow, I am able to bend it around the hull without any streaming at all. So I think the solution here is to leave it attached like this for a week to train the bend into it, and then try screwing it in again. In the meantime I can get on with other small tasks.


The next piece takes the bend with no trouble.

After successfully leaving the stick clamped to the hull for a week, however, the same thing happened when I started drilling for the screws. This topic has now earned itself a chapter in the Problems page.


The third split.

A new straight grained piece of Merbau behaved much better, and when I eventually got sick of dodging the clamps which were holding the forward rubbers in their training positions, I bit the bullet again, with much more success. Both forward sticks took the bend without any of those groans and creaks which accompanied the previous ones. They are now attached to the sheer, but will need to be removed again for scarfing with the next pieces.


The successfully attached forward rubbers.

Success at this stage, however, will not necessarily follow through. The question now is whether to scarf the full length rubber together, or to continue with the unjoined strips. The rear segment will probably give me even more grief than the forward one has. It has to bend down to follow the slope of the deck, and it has 36 mm. of stock to resist the bend. If I go ahead and scarf now, and then the rear section breaks I am stuck again, but if I try to bend the rear section by itself it will make for a difficult scarfing procedure to get the components to join up later, while still employing the existing screw holes.

The decision is to proceed with the unjoined segments, and to try to bend the rear section to shape next, preferably without screwing it onto the hull. If that is successful I will scarf the full length and screw it all on. The experiment satisfied me that the rear member would take the strain, so it is back to the scarfing jig again.



This time there is no trouble getting them to take the curves, and the still unshaped rubbers are screwed into place without any adhesive. Before I attempt to glue them on I want to mask off the top strake, and get some finish onto the covering boards so that the squeeze out does not stain them permanently. The previous idea of putting a small inlay into the gap between the covering boards and the rubbers is not necessary. The great majority of the length of these joins shows no gap at all. In the area of the scarf joints there are some which have opened up a little, but they can be obscured by slipping some fine shavings of Merbau into them when the glue is wet, and then sanding them off later.


The starboard rubber in the process of being screwed on, and the port already done.


While I am getting the covering boards ready for a coat of finish, I may as well do the rest of the deck in preparation for the caulking, so the final attachment of the gunwale will have to wait until then.


Top of Page



147. Hatch Hinges

The plan calls for the forward hatch to be a single, sideways opening hatch with a piano hinge along one side of it, and for the rear hatch to be a drop down pot type which is not hinged.

Let's deal with the forward one first. While a piano hinge may seem to be an attractive and easy solution, the large number of screws it employs, and the fact that they have to be pan heads because of the thin leaves, makes it quite unwieldy. The old boats have chrome or stainless steel surrounds on their hatches, and simple butt hinges, and the forward hatch is divided down the midline, with one half opening in each direction. The hinges lie outboard of a trim strip attached to the hatch itself, so that the trim can barely cover the gap between hatch and deck.


The traditional butt hinge solution.

The alternative arrangement, with piano hinges, covers the gap easily, but at the expense of having far more screws.


The alternative piano hinge treatment.

In each case, extra trim strips, screwed to the hatch and overhanging it, serve to cover the gaps in front and behind, and in the middle between the two halves. If a piano hinge can be found with thick enough leaves that would allow the use of countersunk screws I think that would be a good solution. If not, the pan heads could probably be used, as they would be prevented from bumping into each other by the cowl vents on top of the hatches which will limit their opening (quite apart from the fact that they are staggered on each of the leaves). But it is not a good look. Here is a shot of a trial hinge from when the hatch was being glued up.



The rear hatch has to be either drop down, as the plan says, or opening on a single hinge. The camber of the deck would not allow the use of two hinges, and neither would the slope. The only way a hinged rear hatch can open is to the rear, so that its frame, which is constructed in a vertical plane, can clear the vertical hatch opening surrounds. The flag socket will be screwed to the hatch, and could possibly be used as a handle to open it, but an inset ring pull will keep it secure when closed and look a bit more professional.

Having decided to go with the piano hinges, I attached one side with a few holding screws to check for alignment and openability. The clearance was good, but there has to be an easing of the opposing faces of each hatch when they are both in place. To find out how much easing is necessary, a line is marked on the deck at centre, and the hinged hatch is opened until its bottom is level with the deck. The line is transferred to the hatch bottom and the trim line is established, which can then be achieved by an adjustment of the fence angle on the router.


The starboard hatch is attached, the centre line marked and a trim point established.

After trimming both hatches equally they can both be attached and tested for clearance. A little minor adjustment may be necessary to allow for later varnish application. But that is basically the hatch covers done.

When they are open their cowl vents sit on the deck. They actually touch the softer mahogany, and will dent it if some sort of protection is not provided. To fit a hatch limiter would restrict its opening to about 90°, which would not be ideal for getting into the motor compartment, so perhaps a buffer of some sort may be the answer. I will think about that one for a while.



 


Top of Page



148. Foredeck Hardware

There is a mixture of functional and traditional elements in the hardware requirements. The functional ones are: the mooring cleat, the fairleads, the fender cleats, the navigation lights. Traditional on most Slipper Launches is the spotlight and the burgee staff. Because the electric motor will make for silent or very quiet running I am including a horn too. The clam shell vents on the hatch covers are certainly functional in the old boats, but probably not needed so much without a diesel engine. I am putting them on anyway. In due course there will also be saddles for the fixation of the canopy frame. I would like to be able to get hold of one of the bow ornaments the old boats have too, but I have not been successful. And, whereas I have been able to find some art deco port and starboard lights, I have not been so lucky with the bow and stern lights.

The foredeck is already looking a bit cluttered, and this is without the spotlight.



What is really emphasised now, with the covering boards framing the deck, is how snub nosed this 22' version of the slipper launch is. That is accentuated by the relatively forward position of the cockpit, and even although I have brought mine back by a good 300 mm. from the plan, the foredeck still looks a bit on the short side. Mind you, that is only relative. I am sure that if the length to beam ratio of the original boats were reproduced here the boat would appear sleeker, but at the expense of the comfort of the occupants who would have to squeeze into a much tighter seating arrangement.

The alternative, to take it out to 25', would add to the expense of construction, as it could no longer be made out of multiples of three ply sheets, but it is becoming more and more obvious to me now that the cost of the hull materials represents only a minor part of the cost of the whole boat. Space to build would be the other problem, as it would exceed the length of the home garage.

But I digress. I can live with the short nose when I look at the design drawings of even shorter boats. The Henley Slipper Launch of Selway Fisher is available in 16 or 18 feet versions. The Kennet, which is Ariadne's pedigree, appeals much more.


The Selway Fisher Henley Slipper Launch.



Top of Page



149. Drink Holders

Many of the old boats made provision for loose articles to be placed on small trays on the dash bulkhead. These often had metallic rims acting as fiddles to prevent slippage. The one photographed below also boasts an ashtray holder! Indeed, the Freebody boats have evolved from this tradition, some of them with the fiddle, but others with stem glass rims, presumably to hold the Krug Champagne flutes without danger of them falling.

 
An Andrews built boat (left), a similar arrangement in a Freebody (centre), and the Freebody development (right).

Of these I favour the stem glass holder, although two holes per tray is probably a bit excessive. For these things to work as they are supposed to it is important that the glass should not be able to slip out of the rings by themselves, even with the boat heeling. The stems of most glasses flare out as they approach the bowl of the glass, so the opening into the ring should be too small to allow the flared part through, but wide enough to allow the lower, narrower stem to get out. The ring itself should be large enough to give adequate support to the glass, but small enough not to allow a narrow flute to drop through.

The trays can be attached by ledger strips underneath them, and I will add a small beading on top to close any small gaps between the tray and the lagging. The driver's side tray, depending on its height above the sole, may also have to include a trench to allow the throttle handle to go fully forward.



Above is my design for the passenger's side tray. The holder for the driver's side may have to be moved a bit to one side if the trench is necessary. It would have been useful to have made these trays while the gap behind the lagging was still accessible, to assist in their fixation. Now I have a small challenge on my hands. Salvation may come from the battery charger, of all things. It occurs to me that the perfect place to put a plug to take the power cord to the battery charger would be directly under the drink holder, provided it does not interfere with the glass, of course. If so, a hole might be necessary through the lagging, and this may allow sufficient access for washers and nuts to be run onto bolts from the ledger strips. I will have to wait for the charger to arrive before deciding.

When it does it still leaves the question open. The power cord it accepts plugs into a standard source or extension cord, so no special plumbing is really necessary. The position of the charger is not ideal, as it obscures the switches which are now located on its bottom. But there is nowhere else for it and the current configuration allows the cables which come with it to reach their terminals comfortably.

 
The battery charger mounted on the front of the dash bulkhead. The white cord wrap carries the output leads. The negative passes under the radio to the
main negative bus, and the positive drops down to the common output post on the battery selector switch.

The input cable for the charger carries an IEC female plug at the charger end, which connects, naturally, with an IEC male socket in the charger itself. I now propose to remove the standard plug from its other end and replace it onto a chassis mounted IEC socket, which can be located under the drink holder. A long cord from the mounted socket to a power source will have to have its standard female end replaced with an IEC one, and, I will then have a socket for powering up the charger which will allow the cord to be plugged directly into the cockpit, rather than through an open hatch into the motor compartment. In case of finding myself away from home without a compatible IEC connected cord for recharging the batteries, I will carry spare adapter cord with a standard male end on one side and an IEC female on the other.


IEC components.

The components pictured above are for 10 amp applications, but the charger actually takes 16 amp ones. The 16 amp male socket (c20) is relatively easy to find, but the female (c19) in a rewireable version is as scarce as hens' teeth. There are plenty of pre-fitted cables which can be used, but they are too short for my requirements. Eventually I tracked down a rewireable c19 socket, and could use that on a heavy duty power cord. Although, it seems strange that the standard plug which comes on the accompanying cable for the charger is rated at only 10 amps, and the plug pin size is definitely for 10 amps. The literature says that the current load for this charger at 240 volts is 5 amps. Yet the IEC socket at the other end of the cable is for 16 amps, and the socket on the charger itself is the matching 16 amp one. This might be a puzzle for the experts to advise me about.

(It appears that the high current components are standard fittings to accommodate European and British conditions, where the voltage is 220 - 230 volts, as opposed to the Australian 240 volts. In order to achieve the same wattage the current has to be higher there).



But, to get back to the point, having to cut a hole in the lagging for the IEC socket to be mounted will allow me to gain access to the retro-lagging space, which will simplify mounting the drink holder. That is why I bring up all this detail under the current heading. The holder itself is supported on ledger strips, and the socket fits right underneath it on the passenger side.



These things are a nightmare to fit. All the angles have to be spot on, and even then there are irregularities in the lagging, which means that small gaps appear between the lagging and the drink holder in some parts. The only practical way to close them is to fill them with some sort of wood coloured putty. That will have to be done after the finish goes on the holders.

On the driver's side, the hole for the glass has to be moved just slightly away from the throttle, but it turns out that no trench is necessary for the handle. It stops just short of the holder when full ahead



Top of Page


Forward to July '09

Back to Ariadne front page
Back to Monthly Progress chart

Back to January '06
Back to February '06
Back to March '06
Back to April '06
Back to May '06
Back to June '06
Back to July '06
Back to August '06
Back to September '06
Back to October '06
Back to November '06
Back to December '06

Back to January '07
Back to February '07
Back to March '07
Back to April '07
Back to May '07
Back to June '07
Back to July '07
Back to August '07
Back to September '07
Back to October '07
Back to November '07
Back to December '07

Back to January '08
Back to February '08
Back to March '08
Back to April '08
Back to May '08
Back to June '08
Back to July '08
Back to August '08
Back to October '08
Back to November '08
Back to December '08

Back to January '09
Back to February '09
Back to March '09
Back to April '09
Back to May '09

Problems  shows higher resolution shots as well.

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional